Tuesday, March 28Welcome

The Rapid Adoption of Facial Recognition Reveals Surprising Pitfalls

Illustration of a pixelated mugshot.

Illustrated by Maura Roche/Axios

The ferocious development and deployment of facial recognition technology has outpaced efforts to corral its alarming pitfalls.

Important reasons: Police, retail stores, airports, and sports arenas are rapidly increasing biometric surveillance. However, critics say the results are too blindly relied upon and not enough reconfirmation of agreement has been done.

Catch up soon: State-of-the-art facial recognition surveillance technology is designed to identify people on security cameras in real-time or in close proximity.

  • It would be interesting to match someone’s CCTV footage with images tied to that person’s identity and stored in various databases, as well as publicly available images online, such as police headshots and social media profiles. purpose.
  • Face recognition can even unlock your smartphone or tablet without a password.

News promotion: A black man was recently imprisoned in Georgia for nearly a week after a facial recognition system mistakenly matched his face with a suspect’s face in a New Orleans robbery.

  • A man who said he had never been to Louisiana was released after detectives realized his mistake, reports The Advocate.
  • Wired reported last year that facial recognition technology has led to at least three false arrests in the past, all involving black men. The technology has long been criticized for its inability to accurately identify black faces.

in New York, A personal injury attorney said he was recently evicted from Radio City Music Hall, which is owned by Madison Square Garden Entertainment.

  • Attorney Kelly Conlon works for a company involved in a personal injury lawsuit against a restaurant run by MSG.
  • MSG has removed all company attorneys involved in lawsuits against the company from its property, including arenas where the New York Knicks and Rangers play. To enforce that ban, we’re using facial recognition software, which is increasingly being used as a security tool in sports stadiums and other venues.
  • In a statement to the New York Times, the company said, “While we understand that this policy is frustrating for some, we cannot ignore the fact that litigation creates an inherently hostile environment. .

Zoom out: Some cities and states that have restricted the use of facial recognition in the past are considering whether to relax those rules to combat rising crime. increase.

What they say: Some critics have cited the Madison Square Garden encounter as an example of private enterprise overkill.

  • “This is why we need to completely ban all use of facial recognition surveillance in public venues such as bars, restaurants, retail stores, music venues and sports venues,” says digital advocacy group Fight for the Evan Greer, director of The Future, said in a statement.

What we see: Several lawmakers have introduced legislation to curb the use of facial recognition technology nationwide. The proposal is not yet in progress.

What’s next: On a technical level, facial recognition technology will continue to improve. Researchers at the University of Georgia are working on a system that works based solely on the shape of people’s ears.

  • Surveillance-based facial recognition is expected to become prevalent, especially in high-security areas, despite efficacy and ethical concerns. The U.S. Transportation Security Administration is testing the technology at major airports.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *